
There are three types of private prisons in Florida that serve unique populations: adult male, adult female and youthful offender male facilities. Following the approach of Farabee and Knight, the analysis conducted for this study examines the question of whether differences in recidivism rates exist across privately and publicly operated prison within each of these three offender types. Table 2 depicts the private prisons operated for each the three offender types and the total and average annual releases from private prisons during the study period. All releases beginning with the month the private inmate was released within each of the three offender types were selected. The adult male cohort includes all men released beginning in August 1995, when Moore Haven Correctional Facility released the first male inmate.21 The adult female cohort includes all women released beginning in May 1995, when Gadsden Correctional Facility released the first adult female inmate. The youthful offender male cohort includes releases from May 1997 when the first offender was released from the Lake City Correctional Facility, the only private facility designated as a male youthful offender institution.
| Table 2: Private Prisons Operating in Florida* | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population Served | Facility Name | Year Opened |
Security Level |
Population on June 30, 2003 | Total Releases through June 30, 2003 ** |
Average Annual Releases*** |
| Adult Male | Bay C.F. | 1995 | Medium | 746 |
2,803 |
350 |
| Adult Male | Moore Haven C.F. | 1995 | Medium | 751 |
3,106 |
388 |
| Adult Male | South Bay C.F. | 1997 | Close | 1,316 |
1,243 |
207 |
| Sub Total | 2,813 |
7,152 |
945 |
|||
| Adult Female | Gadsden C.F. | 1995 | Medium | 983 |
3,619 |
452 |
| Youthful Offender Male | Lake City C.F. | 1997 | Close | 349 |
841 |
140 |
| Total | 4,145 |
11,612 |
1,537 |
|||
| * Release data count only the subset that are first permanent
releases and, therefore, appropriate for recidivism analysis. ** Permanent releases directly from facility. *** Based on direct releases from facility per full year of operation. |
||||||
Table 3 displays the number of inmate releases included in each of the three offender types for each of the six treatment definitions. Note that the treatment groups may be larger than the direct releases reported in Table 2 due to the way each analysis group is defined.
| Table 3: Number of Releases in Cohorts by Offender Type and Treatment Definition | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis Group |
Adult Males | Adult Females | Youthful Offender Males |
|||
| Treatment | Control | Treatment | Control | Treatment | Control | |
| A1 | 3,553 |
48,744 |
1,866 |
3,631 |
450 |
3,633 |
| A2 | 2,793 |
38,583 |
1,332 |
2,702 |
376 |
3,023 |
| B1 | 2,993 |
58,342 |
640 |
4,714 |
396 |
3,896 |
| B2 | 3,176 |
65,483 |
1,447 |
5,066 |
631 |
4,203 |
| B3 | 3,306 |
66,199 |
1,133 |
5,395 |
474 |
4,507 |
| C1 | 3,562 |
71,276 |
1,712 |
6,047 |
439 |
4,189 |
This research does not comparatively evaluate recidivism rates from individual private prisons for three reasons. First, the focus of this research is not on the relative performance of individual prisons’ recidivism rates. Addressing that question properly would require data collection on facility characteristics and operational methods that are out of the scope of this study. Second, significant numbers of releases from the South Bay and Lake City facilities did not occur until FY1997-98, therefore, the number of cases for these facilities are too few to provide sufficiently reliable estimates for such comparisons. Third, these facilities are operated by more than one corporation and the Gadsden vendor has changed since it opened. Comparable data for facilities have not been collected on services provided, such as education, training, and treatment programs, which reduce recidivism rates according to some literature.22
Notes: