Comparison Table
A comparison table of the results of the WSIPP meta-analysis and program data from several Florida studies/analyses is provided below:
In-prison therapeutic communities without community aftercare for drug-involved offenders;
and |
5.3% |
7
|
(F1) 11.2% (Level 3)*
(F2) 15.0% (Level 3)*
(F3) 12.6% (Level 2)* |
3 |
Cognitive-behavioral drug treatment in prison |
6.8% |
8 |
Drug Treatment in the community |
12.4% |
5 |
(F4) 30.6% (Level 4)**
(F5) 32.0% (Level 4)***
(F6) 27.0% (Level 3)* |
3 |
Basic adult education programs in prison |
5.1% |
7 |
(F7) 15.8% (Level 3)*
(F8) 13.6% (Level 2)* |
2 |
Vocational education in prison |
12.6% |
3 |
(F9) 26.6% (Level 3)*
(F10) 31.8% (Level 2)* |
2 |
PROGRAMS IN NEED OF ADDITIONAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT |
Faith-based programs |
0.0% |
5 |
Currently working with Urban Institute and FSU on evaluation of FCBI |
To Be Done |
Work release programs |
5.6% |
4 |
Preliminary data show recidivism reduction; study to be completed in 2006 |
To Be Done |
* - Treatment group includes only program completers
** - Study focused on offenders re-arrested and percent given is the expected decrease in re-arrests due to non-residential substance abuse treatment for 90 days or more
*** - Percent given is the percent decrease in new offenses averted due to non-residential substance abuse treatment. Linster also reported impact for residential substance abuse treatment
