|
FACT: Scoresheets that have been received by the Department of Corrections for offenders sentenced under the Florida Criminal Punishment Code are not representative of the true impact of sentencing events under the Code.
FINDINGS:
- In order to determine the appropriateness of the comparison between the 1994 Sentencing Guidelines and the Criminal Punishment code undertaken in this report, baseline data, under the previous sentencing policy, had to be established for comparison purposes. The baseline was identified as offenses committed between October 1, 1994 and September 30, 1995 with sentence dates in FY 1995-1996. The sentence date constraint, by design, excludes any Code scoresheets from being included in the baseline data file.
- There were 56,067 scoresheets submitted to the Department of Corrections with sentence dates in FY1995-1996 and offense dates between October 1, 1994 and September 30, 1995. This data will be used in comparison with the Code data to illustrate the impact of the new sentencing policy.
- Lag Time - The average length of time that passes from the date an offender commits a crime to the date the offender is sentenced for that crime is 5.6 months. As defined by the word "average", half of the lag times that occur are less than 5.6 months and half are greater than 5.6 months (Table 1).
- More serious and violent crimes typically have much longer lag time than the less serious property or drug crimes. A data file that is constrained by the date of offense must allow for enough time for the serious and violent crimes to be processed and convicted in order to represent a true distribution of sentencing events. The Florida Criminal Punishment Code went into effect for offenses committed on or after October 1, 1998. As of September 12, 2000, the Department of Corrections had received over 90,000 Code scoresheets. However, because of the long lag time for serious offenses, the information to date is skewed more heavily by the less serious offenses.
- The data included in the 1994 Sentencing Guidelines scoresheets with offense dates between October 1, 1994 and September 30, 1995 and sentence dates in FY1995-1996 were selected for the analysis because they look, in aggregate, similar to the Code scoresheets that have currently been received by the department. For example, the average lag time for FY1995-1996 sentencing events is 6.6 months. Of the scoresheets received to date under the Code, the average lag time is 5.6 months (Table 1). When the lag times are examined by offense severity level and type of primary offense, the average lag time for level 10 offenses (most serious) under the Code is 5.4 months. In FY1995-1996, the average lag time for level 10 offenses was 7.2 months. Also, for murder/manslaughter, the average lag time from offense to sentence is 9.4 months under the Code and 9.8 months in FY1995-1996 (Table 2).
- An examination of the distribution of type of offenses represented is also revealing. In FY1995-1996, the more violent, serious offenses represented twenty-four percent (24.0%) of the scoresheets, while under the Code, less than eighteen percent (17.8%) were the more violent, serious offenses (Table 3). At a more detailed level, felony traffic and driving offenses had no impact on the offense distribution in FY1995-1996, while over seven percent (7.2%) of the Code scoresheets were for felony traffic offenses (Table 4).
|