Skip navigation.
Home | About Us | Contact Us
Rick Scott, Governor
Florida Department of Corrections, Secretary Michael D. Crews

Florida Department of Corrections
Timothy H. Cannon, Interim Secretary

Executive Summary: Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services (Modality 3)

Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) offers three (3) Tracks of service. This Modality is designed primarily to be provided after completion of Modality 1 or Modality 2 and also to offer a continuum of care for inmates who are not released from incarceration after completion of Modality 1 or 2.

Profiles of Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Program Facilities

Profiles of Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Program Facilities On June 30, 2003
Facility Population Provider Number of Program Slots
No Programs N/A N/A 0

Profiles of Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Programs Closed during FY 2002-2003
Facility Population Provider Number of Program Slots
Madison WC* Male Civigenics, Inc. 50
Walton WC** Male Unlimited Path, Inc. 50
TOTAL 100
* Position converted to Madison CI Modality 1 effective 12/30/02.
** Program converted to a Modality 1 effective 12/30/02.

Workload

TABLE 4A:Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Program Enrollment Data, By Fiscal Year
  • During the ten-year period of this report, 24,619 different inmates have been enrolled in Modality 3 programming.
  • Due to FY 2001-02 budget reductions, program enrollment dramatically decreased for FY 2002-03.
  • All Modality 3 services were terminated on 12/30/02. Therefore on 6/30/03, there were no inmates enrolled in Modality 3 programs.
TABLE 4B: FY 2002-03 Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Program Enrollment Data, By Facility
  • In FY 2002-03, 252 different inmates received Modality 3 services and there were 192 new enrollment events. There were no inmates enrolled in Modality 3 programming on June 30, 2003, reflecting FY 2001-02 budget reductions.

Outcomes

TABLE 4C(1): Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Program Outcomes By Fiscal Year, By Inmate (3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP)
  • The average SUCCESS RATE for Modality 3 services over the period of FY 1992-93 to FY 1999-00 is 95.1%.
TABLE 4C(2): Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Program Outcomes By Fiscal Year, By Inmate (2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP)
  • FY 2000-01 shows an increase in SUCCESS RATE to 94.8% compared to 92.7% in FY 1999-00.
TABLE 4D: FY 2002-03 Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Exit Data (Event-Based), By Facility
  • The overall SUCCESS RATE across facilities for FY 2002-03 was 88.3%.
  • More than one half (53.2%) of outcome events in this fiscal year were successful.

Recommitment Rates

TABLE 4E: FY 2000-01 (2-Year Follow-Up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 2-year follow-up on Modality 3 participants released in FY 2000-01, program completers were slightly more likely overall to be recommitted to prison or community supervision than non-completers (28.6% vs. 28.4%).
  • Program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison for a new offense than non-completers (11.6% vs. 12.8%).
  • Program completers were also less likely to be recommitted to supervision for a new offense than non-completers (6.7% vs. 8.7%).
TABLE 4F: FY 1999-00 (3-Year Follow-Up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 3-year follow-up on Modality 3 participants released in FY 1999-00, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or community supervision than non-completers (37.2% vs. 39%).
TABLE 4G: FY 1998-99 (4-Year Follow-Up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 4-year follow-up on Modality 3 participants released in FY 1998-99, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or community supervision than non-completers (42.5% vs. 46.7%).
TABLE 4H: FY 1997-98 (5-Year Follow-Up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 5-year follow-up on Modality 3 participants released in FY 1997-98, program completers were slightly more likely overall than non-completers to be recommitted to prison or community supervision (48.5% vs. 48.3%).
  • Program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison for a new offense than non-completers (27.5% vs. 28.2%).
  • Program completers were also less likely to be recommitted to supervision for a new offense than non-completers (10.8% vs. 12.1%).
TABLE 4I: FY 1996-97 (6-Year Follow-Up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 6-year follow-up on Modality 3 participants released in FY 1996-97, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or community supervision than non-completers (50% vs. 51.6%).

In summarizing the recommitment data, in general, the recommitment rate for program completers has been better than that for program non-completers. For FY 1998-99 releases, the recommitment rate for program completers was substantially better than program non-completers, with recommitment rates of 42.5% and 46.7%, respectively.