Skip navigation.
Home | About Us | Contact Us
Rick Scott, Governor
Florida Department of Corrections, Secretary Michael D. Crews

Florida Department of Corrections
Michael D. Crews, Secretary

Executive Summary: Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services (Modality 3)

Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse and Transitional Services (MODALITY 3) offers three (3) Tracks of service. This MODALITY is designed primarily to be provided after completion of MODALITY 1 or MODALITY 2 and also to offer a continuum of care for inmates who are not released from incarceration after completion of MODALITY.

Profiles of Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Program Facilities

Facility

Population

Provider

Number of Program Slots

No Programs

N/A

N/A

0

Workload

TABLE 4A: Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Program Enrollment Data, By Fiscal Year
  • During the ten-year period covered by this report, 24,619 inmates had enrolled in MODALITY 3.
  • Due to budget cuts, program enrollment dramatically decreased from FY 2001-02 to FY 2002-03 for all types of enrollments (new enrollments, new inmates, different inmates, and the June 30th enrollment). The respective enrollments for FY 2001-02 were 2,294 (new enrollment events), 1,967 (new inmates), 2,761 (different inmates), and 102 (6/30 enrollment), compared to FY 2002-03 that had respective enrollments by type of 192; 176; 251; and 0.
  • The ten-year average for each respective type of enrollments was 2,093; 1,938; 2,462; and 586.
TABLE 4B: FY 2003-04 Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Program Enrollment Data, By Facility
  • There is no data for this table since the program was not offered during FY 2003-04

Outcomes

TABLE 4C(1): Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Program Outcomes By Fiscal Year, By Inmate (3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP)
  • Based on a 3-year follow-up after initial program entry, for the eight-year period reported the 21,520 program exits included 12,970 (60.3%) which were successful, 672 (3.1%) unsuccessful, and 7,878 (36.6%) administrative.
  • The MODALITY 3 SUCCESS RATE for the last fiscal year reported in this table (FY 2000-01) was up to 96.2% from the 92.7% for the previous year.
  • The overall trend has shown a relatively stable SUCCESS RATE from 97.3% in FY 1993-94 compared to 96.2% in FY 2000-01.
  • The average SUCCESS RATE over the eight years reported was 95.1%.
TABLE 4C(2): Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Program Outcomes By Fiscal Year, By Inmate (2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP)
  • FY 2001-02 shows a decrease in SUCCESS RATE to 93.7% compared to 96.2% in FY 2000-01.
TABLE 4D: FY 2003-04 Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Exit Data (Event-Based), By Facility
  • There is no data for this table since the program was not offered during FY 2003-04.

Recommitment Rates

TABLE 4E: FY 2001-02 (2-Year Follow-Up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 2-year follow-up on MODALITY 3 participants released in FY 2001-02, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or community supervision than non-completers (26.5% vs. 29.0%).
TABLE 4F: FY 2000-01 (3-Year Follow-Up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 3-year follow-up on MODALITY 3 participants released in FY 2000-01, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or community supervision than non-completers (37.3% vs. 39.7%).
TABLE 4G: FY 1999-00 (4-Year Follow-Up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 4-year follow-up on MODALITY 3 participants released in FY 1999-00, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or community supervision than non-completers (43.5% vs. 45.9%).
TABLE 4H: FY 1998-99 (5-Year Follow-Up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 5-year follow-up on MODALITY 3 participants released in FY 1998-99, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or community supervision than non-completers (46.9% vs. 51.2%).
TABLE 4I: FY 1997-98 (6-Year Follow-Up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services Modality 3 Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 6-year follow-up on MODALITY 3 participants released in FY 1997-98, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or community supervision than non-completers (51.9% vs. 53.3%).

In summarizing the recommitment data, in general, the recommitment rate for program completers has been better than that for program non-completers. For FY 1998-99 releases, the recommitment rate for program completers was substantially better than program non-completers, with recommitment rates of 46.9% and 51.2%, respectively.