Skip navigation.
Home | About Us | Contact Us
Rick Scott, Governor
Florida Department of Corrections, Secretary Michael D. Crews

Florida Department of Corrections
Timothy H. Cannon, Interim Secretary

Executive Summary: Intensive Outpatient Services (Modality 1)

Intensive Outpatient (Modality 1) services are designed to be four (4) to six (6) months in length and delivers structured substance abuse program services to inmates with a history of addictions while still allowing participants to live, work and be maintained in general population. This program requires a minimum of 12 hours face to face contact with counselor per week per inmate and generally considered either an AM, PM or evening job/program assignment.

Profiles of Intensive Outpatient Services (Modality 1) Program Facilities

Facility Provider Number of
Program Slots
Avon Park CI Unlimited Path, Inc. 90
Cross City CI Civigenics, Inc. 90
Dade CI Civigenics, Inc. 70
Everglades CI Civigenics, Inc. 90
Gulf CI – Annex F.A.C.T.S. 70
Hernando CI Civigenics, Inc. 70
Hillsborough CI Unlimited Path, Inc. 50
Lancaster CI Civigenics, Inc. 70
Lowell CI Civigenics, Inc. 70
Lawtey CI Unlimited Path, Inc. 20
Madison CI Civigenics, Inc. 50
Marion CI Unlimited Path, Inc. 90
Mayo CI Civigenics, Inc. 90
Okaloosa CI Unlimited Path, Inc. 70
Okeechobee CI Civigenics, Inc. 90
Sumter CI Unlimited Path, Inc. 70
Taylor CI Civigenics, Inc. 70
Wakulla CI F.A.C.T.S. 50
Walton Work Camp Unlimited Path, Inc. 20
Washington CI F.A.C.T.S. 70
Total 1,360

Workload

Table 2A: Intensive Outpatient Modality 1 Program Enrollment Data, by Fiscal Year
  • During the ten-year period covered by this report, 29,160 different inmates participated in Modality 1 programming.
  • On June 30, 2005, there were 1,353 inmates enrolled in Modality 1 programming.
  • The significant decrease in the number of different inmates that enrolled in Modality 1 programming during FY 2002-03, reflects the full impact of reduced funding for institutional substance abuse programs that began during FY 2001-02.
  • Data for the last two fiscal years reflect the allocation of additional dollars to Modality I Programming.
Table 2B: FY 2004-05 Intensive Outpatient Modality 1 Program Enrollment Data, by Facility
  • In FY 2004-05, 4,779 different inmates participated in Modality 1 programming.
  • Everglades CI had the greatest number (347) of different inmates enrolled in Modality 1 programming. Lowell CI had the smallest number (21).

Outcomes

Table 2C(1): Intensive Outpatient (Modality 1) Program Outcomes by Fiscal Year, by Inmate (3-Year Follow-up)
  • Based on a 3-year follow-up after initial program entry, there were 23,321 program exits.
  • During the 8-year period covered in this table, there were more than four times as many successful exits as unsuccessful exits (56.4% vs. 12.7%).
Table 2C(2): Intensive Outpatient (Modality 1) Program Outcomes by Fiscal Year, by Inmate (2-Year Follow-up)
  • For FY 2001-02 (2-Year Follow-up), the success rate was 91.3%.
Table 2D: FY 2003-04 Intensive Outpatient Modality 1 Exit Data (Event-Based), by Facility
  • The overall success rate across facilities for FY 2004-05 was 82.0%
  • For FY 2004-05, the Modality 1 program at Okaloosa CI had the highest success rate at 97.9%
  • For FY FY 2004-05 the majority of outcome events were successful (67.6%).

Recommitment Rates*

Table 2E: FY 2002-03 (2-Year Follow-up), Intensive Outpatient (Modality 1) Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 2-year follow-up on participation for inmates released during FY 2002-03, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or supervision than program noncompleters (32.4% vs. 32.5%).
Table 2F: FY 2001-02 (3-Year Follow-up), Intensive Outpatient (Modality 1) Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 3-year follow-up on participation for inmates released during FY 2001-02, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or supervision than program noncompleters (42.8% vs. 47.2%).
Table 2G: FY 2000-01 (4-Year Follow-up), Intensive Outpatient Modality 1 Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 4-year follow-up on participation for inmates released during FY 2000-01, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or supervision than program noncompleters (45.4% vs. 49.7%).
Table 2H: FY 1999-00 (5-Year Follow-up), Intensive Outpatient (Modality 1) Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 5-year follow-up on participation for inmates released during FY 1999-00, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or supervision than program noncompleters (52.1% vs. 56.9%).
Table 2I: FY 1998-99 (6-Year Follow-up), Intensive Outpatient (Modality 1) Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation
  • For a 6-year follow-up on participation for inmates released during FY 1998-99, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or supervision than program noncompleter (56.6% vs. 58.7%).

In summarizing the recommitment data, in general, the recommitment rate for program completers has been better than that for program non-completers. For FY 1999-00 releases, the recommitment rate for program completers was substantially better than program noncompleters, with recommitment rates of 52.1% and 56.9%, respectively.

* Based on year released from prison. Program completion occurred sometime during the incarceration period.