Executive Summary: Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services (Modality 3)

Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse and Transitional Services (Modality 3) offers three (3) Tracks of service. This Modality is designed primarily to be provided after completion of Modality 1 or Modality 2 and also to offer a continuum of care for inmates who are not released from incarceration after completion of Modality.

Profiles of Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Program Facilities on June 30, 2002

Facility	Provider	Number of Program Slots
Madison Work Camp	Civigenics, Inc.	50
Walton Work Camp	Unlimited Path, Inc.	50
Total		100

Profiles of Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Programs Closed During FY 2001-2002*

Facility	Provider	Number of Program Slots Lost
Pensacola WRC	Cordova Counseling	50
Marianna WRC	Unlimited Path, Inc.	50
Panama City WRC	Unlimited Path, Inc.	50
Tallahassee WRC	F.A.C.T.S.	50
Daytona Beach WRC	Counseling Associates	50
Gainesville CI	Civigenics	30
Gainesville WC	Civigenics	50
Lake City WRC	Tri-County	50
Santa Fe WRC	Tri-County	50
Atlantic WRC	CARP	25
Cocoa WRC	Colonial Counseling	50
Kissimmee WRC	Colonial Counseling	50
Lake CI	Bridges of America	40
Orlando WRC	Colonial Counseling	25
Pinehills WRC	Colonial Counseling	25
Pinellas WRC	Center for Rational Living	25
St. Petersburg WRC	Operation PAR	50
Tarpon Springs WRC	Center for Rational Living	50
Zephyrhills CI	Bridges of America	40
Broward CI	Bridges of America	40
Ft. Pierce WRC	CARP	50
Hollywood WRC**	Spectrum	25
Opa Locka WRC	Agape	50
Pompano WRC	Spectrum	50
West Palm Beach WRC	CARP	75
Miami North WRC	Agape	50
Total		1,150
* Budget reductions required program closures. All closures occurred on or prior to December 2001. ** Program did not close. It was converted to a Substance Abuse Program Center in October 2001.

Workload

Table 4A: Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Program Enrollment Data, by Fiscal Year

• During the ten-year period covered by this report, 24,619 inmates had enrolled in Modality 3.
• Due to budget cuts, program enrollment dramatically decreased from FY 2001-02 to FY 2002-03 for all types of enrollments (new enrollments, new inmates, different inmates, and the June 30th enrollment). The respective enrollments for FY 2001-02 were 2,294 (new enrollment events), 1,967 (new inmates), 2,761 (different inmates), and 102 (6/30 enrollment), compared to FY 2002-03 that had respective enrollments by type of 192; 176; 251; and 0.
• The ten-year average for each respective type of enrollments was 2,093; 1,938; 2,462; and 586.

Table 4B: FY 2004-05 Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Program Enrollment Data, by Facility

• There is no data for this table since the program was not offered during FY 2004-05

Outcomes

Table 4C(1): Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Program Outcomes by Fiscal Year, by Inmate (3-Year Follow-up)

• Based on a 3-year follow-up after initial program entry, for the eight-year period reported the 22,097 program exits included 12,958 (58.6%) which were successful, 714 (3.2%) unsuccessful, and 8,425 (38.1%) administrative.
• The Modality 3 success rate for the last fiscal year reported in this table (FY 2001-02) decreased to 92.0% from the 96.2% for the previous year.
• The overall trend has shown a relatively stable success rate from 98.8% in FY 1994-95 compared to 92.0% in FY 2001-02.
• The average success rate over the eight years reported was 94.8%.

Table 4C(2): Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Program Outcomes by Fiscal Year, by Inmate (2-Year Follow-up)

• FY 2002-03 shows a decrease in success rate to 86.8% compared to 92.0% in FY 2001-02.

Table 4D: FY 2004-05 Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Exit Data (Event-Based), by Facility

• There is no data for this table since the program was not offered during FY 2004-05.

Recommitment Rates

Table 4E: FY 2002-03 (2-Year Follow-up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation

• For a 2-year follow-up on Modality 3 participants released in FY 2002-03, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or community supervision than non-completers (32.2% vs. 29.7%).

Table 4F: FY 2001-02 (3-Year Follow-up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation

• For a 3-year follow-up on Modality 3 participants released in FY 2001-02, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or community supervision than non-completers (36.0% vs. 39.8%).

Table 4G: FY 2000-01 (4-Year Follow-up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention And Transitional Services (Modality 3) Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation

• For a 4-year follow-up on Modality 3 participants released in FY 2000-01, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or community supervision than noncompleters (42.9% vs. 45.9%).

Table 4H: FY 1999-00 (5-Year Follow-up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation

• For a 5-year follow-up on Modality 3 participants released in FY 1999-00, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or community supervision than noncompleters (48.0% vs. 50.3%).

Table 4I: FY 1998-99 (6-Year Follow-up), Comprehensive Outpatient, Relapse, Prevention and Transitional Services (Modality 3) Recommitment Data, by Level of Participation

• For a 6-year follow-up on Modality 3 participants released in FY 1998-99, program completers were less likely to be recommitted to prison or community supervision than non-completers (50.7% vs. 55.2%).

In summarizing the recommitment data, in general, the recommitment rate for program completers has been better than that for program non-completers. For FY 1998-99 releases, the recommitment rate for program completers was substantially better than program non-completers, with recommitment rates of 50.7% and 55.2%, respectively.